Time to end the bad blood between the Yorubas and Ndigbo
Time to end the bad blood between
the Yorubas and Ndigbo
By Femi Aribisala
THE Yorubas and the Igbos, two of the most
resourceful, engaging and outgoing ethnic groups in Nigeria, are becoming implacable
enemies. Increasingly, they seem to hate one another with pure hatred. I never
appreciated the extent of their animosity until the social media came of age in
Nigeria. Now, hardly a day passes that you will not find Yorubas and Igbos
exchanging hateful words on internet blogs.
The Nigerian civil war ended in
1970. Nevertheless, it continues to rage today on social media mostly by people
who were not even alive during the civil war. In blog after blog, the Yorubas
and the Igbos go out of their way to abuse one another for the most
inconsequential of reasons. This hatred is becoming so deep-seated, it needs to
be addressed before it gets completely out of hand. It is time to call a truce.
A conscious effort needs to be made by opinion-leaders on both sides of the
ethnic divide to put a stop to this nonsense. Ethnic stereotyping Both the
Yorubas and the Igbo stereotype one another. To the Igbo, the Yorubas are the
“ngbati ngbati” “ofemmanu” who eat too much oil. They are masters of duplicity
and deception; saying one thing while meaning another. To the Yorubas, the Igbo
are clannish and money-minded. They are Shylock traders who specialise in
selling counterfeit goods. But the truth is that stereotypes are essentially
generalisations and exaggerations. In a lot of cases, they are unreliable and
untrue. Stereotypes must be recognised at their most effective as a joke. They
are the stock-in-trade of seasoned comedians; the garnish for side-splitting
anecdotes at weddings and social gatherings. Stereotypes should not be taken
seriously. We should laugh at them without being offended by them. The more
Nigeria develops as a melting pot of nations, the more we should be able to
laugh at ourselves. The greater inclination to do this denotes increasing
strength of character and self-confidence. However, with the advancement of
social media, the banter has gone way beyond the jocular and innocuous to
outright malice and unadulterated hatred. Increasingly, what you hear are
abusive and pejorative labels of “Yariba,” “Yorubastards” and “Yorobbers;” as
well as “Eboes,” “Zooafrans” and “Biafrauds.” As the insults fly with abandon,
you begin to wonder where all this comes from. What is the basis of all this
hate? In the sixties, the Igbo were slaughtered in pogroms in the North.
However, the principal exchange of
hateful words today is not between Northerners and Easterners, but between
Easterners and Westerners. Why are these two ethnic groups so much at
loggerheads? How did we get to this pass? Malicious stereotyping often involves
denigrating the strengths of others. The Igbo are very enterprising; a very
valuable resource in a developing country like Nigeria. But then this is
castigated as mercenary. The Yorubas take great pride in education; another
valuable asset in today’s modern world. But then they are derided as using this
to get one over on others. The saving grace is that the two groups live
side-by-side in peace and quiet in different parts of the country. Moreover,
the animosity between them, especially among the younger generation, has not
prevented their boys and girls and men and women from falling in love. Yoruba
men marry Igbo women; and Igbo men marry Yoruba women. Meanwhile, “a lutta
continua.” Awolowo factor The Igbo tar the Yorubas with the brush of Awolowo,
who they label as “the father of ethnicity in Nigeria.” In that narrative, it
is conveniently overlooked that the broadmindedness of the Yorubas enabled
Azikiwe, an Igbo man, to win a regional election in the Yoruba heartland in
1954. Instead, what is harped on is the fact that Awolowo mobilised Yoruba
politicians to nullify that victory by decamping from Azikiwe’s more
nationalist camp to Awolowo’s more ethnically-focused camp. One of the
newspaper headlines that sticks in my memory from 50 years ago is the one that
said: “If East Goes, West will Go- Awo.” After a visit to Ojukwu in Enugu at
the height of the acrimony over the mass killing of the Igbo in the North in
the mid-1960s, Awolowo declared that if the East was allowed to secede as a
result of acts of omission or commission, he would also lead the West into
secession. This flashed a green light for Igbo secession. But when the East
seceded, Awolowo failed to mobilise the West to follow suit. Not only did the
West not join the East in secession, it joined the North in fighting against
the East. Awolowo then became the Commissioner of Finance and Vice-President of
the Federal Executive Council of the Nigerian government that prosecuted the
war against Biafran secession. The Igbo have rightly deemed this a great
betrayal. But their case against Awolowo did not end there. As finance
minister, Awolowo was the brainchild of the strategy to blockade Biafra;
leading to mass Igbo starvation and deaths. With the end of the war, it was
also alleged that Awolowo orchestrated the policy whereby the totality of
individual holdings of Biafran currency was converted to Nigerian legal tender
at a flat maximum amount of only 20 pounds. This effectively pauperized the
Igbo. Since it also coincided with the period when Nigerian corporations were
being privatised, it had the effect of locking out the Igbo from strategic
sectors of the Nigerian economy; gobbled up in the main by the Hausa-Fulanis
and Yorubas. Brothers in adversity The Igbo case against Awolowo has become the
Igbo case against the Yorubas.
In the process, it is easily overlooked that
prominent Yorubas, like Tai Solarin and Wole Soyinka, defended the Igbo right
to self-determination during the Biafran War. The properties the Igbo left
behind in Yorubaland during the Civil War were not expropriated by the Yorubas,
as they were in some other places. When Odumegwu Ojukwu came back from exile in
Ivory Coast, all his father’s properties in Lagos remained intact. Under
President Obasanjo, a Yoruba man, the Igbos were given the control of Nigeria’s
economic and monetary policy. The Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala;
Governor of the Central Bank, Charles Soludo; and Director-General of the Stock
Exchange, Ndidi Okereke-Onyuike, were all Igbos. So were the Minister of
Education, Obiageli Ezekwesili; and the Director-General of NAFDAC, Dora
Akinyuli. Indeed, Obasanjo favoured the Igbo more than his native Yorubas. He
appointed an Igbo, Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi, as the Minister of Defense and
another, Air Marshal Paul Dike, as Nigeria’s first Igbo Chief of Air Staff.
While the Igbo visit the transgressions of Awolowo on the Yorubas, they do not
visit the favouritism of Obasanjo on the Yorubas.
The sins of Awolowo were
brought again to the fore in 2012 by Chinua Achebe in his book: “There Was a
Country: A Personal History of Biafra.” The blogs came alive as blame was
traded on both sides of the East-West divide. Awolowo was now cast by the Igbos
as the father of the Yorubas; and they were determined to visit his sins on his
Yoruba sons to the third and fourth generations. Mistakes galore Blunders
continue to be made on both sides, fanning the flames of hatred. Governor
Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State blundered by deporting some destitute Igbos
back to the East in the dead of night in 2013. This created uproar in the
sizeable Igbo community in Lagos. Even though Fashola expressly apologised to
Ndigbo for the faux pas, a ridiculous discussion nevertheless ensued about the
rightful ownership of Lagos. Orji Uzor Kalu, former governor of Abia State, put
his foot in it when he declared that Lagos, as a former national capital, was
“no man’s land and so belongs to all of us.” This incensed ethnic jingoists in
Yorubaland who, forgetting the traditional hospitality of the Yorubas, asked
the Igbo to leave Lagos and go back East. But nothing quite compares to the
broadside that came from the Oba of Lagos. During the 2015 election, Oba Rilwan
Akiolu summoned Lagos Igbo leaders to his palace; only to threaten them: “If
anyone of you, I swear in the name of God, goes against my wish that Ambode
will be the next governor of Lagos state, the person is going to die inside
this water. What you people cannot do in Onitsha, Aba or anywhere you cannot do
it here. If you do what I want, Lagos will continue to be prosperous for you,
if you go against my wish, you will perish in the water.” It mattered little to
His Royal Highness that Ambode’s close rival was not an Igbo but Jimi Agbaje;
another Yoruba man. Timeout The Yorubas and Ndigbo do themselves great
disservice by seeing themselves as arch-enemies. Within the framework of
Nigerian politics, this has limited the freedom of action of both ethnic
groups. If one is prominent in this political party, the other is more likely
to align itself with another party. This means the one can always be
manipulated against the other.
Instead, the political space should be opened up
by the possibility that the Yoruba and the Igbo can form an alliance. That
eventuality is not implausible especially because they actually have common
interests. Both groups prefer a Nigeria that practices fiscal federalism. Both
want a country with a weaker centre. Both want a Nigeria that rewards merit,
with a state-structure based on resource-control. Both groups want a Nigeria committed
to self-determination. These are grounds for cooperation as opposed to discord.
If the North is not to continue to take the South for granted, it must not be
allowed to continue to operate in the confidence that the East and the West
will always be divided. In politics, there are no permanent enemies and no
permanent allies. Fifty years down the road, the politics of the Nigerian Civil
War should not be allowed to continue to cast a shadow over Yoruba-Ndigbo
relations. In the Second World War, Germany was the arch-enemy of France, but
now both countries are the staunchest allies. Japan invaded the United States;
but now both are on the same side. These turnarounds can and should be
duplicated in Southern Nigeria. As a first step, there is need for a grand
gesture. A well-publicised meeting between the Afenifere and the Ohaneze, where
declaratory statements should be made about burying the hatchet. Thereafter,
standing committees should be established to deal with flashpoints; such as the
dismantling of Oshodi market in Lagos. The hatred between the Yoruba and Ndigbo
has gone on for far too long. Let there be love shared among us!
Comments
Post a Comment