FROM MY DATA BANK(JAN.29TH,2019):A FLASH BACK TO WHAT :LAI MOH'D SAID ABOUT CJN ONNOGHEN
FGN Press Statement on Developments around CJN Onnoghen's Suspension
Politics | 844 VIEWS |
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
11:11PM / Federal Ministry of Information
and Culture
Gentlemen of the press, thank you for once again honouring
our invitation.
As you would recollect, President Muhammadu Buhari last
Friday complied with the order of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, directing the
suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon Justice Walter Onnoghen,
pending the determination of the cases against him at the Code of Conduct
Tribunal and several fora relating to his alleged breach of the Code of Conduct
for Public Officers.
Since then, there have been widespread reactions from within
and outside the country. In particular, the opposition has latched on to it,
threatening fire and brimstone and concocting all sorts of imaginary scenarios
and generally muddying the waters. In what I will call the theater of the
absurd, the main opposition party, the PDP, even suspended its electioneering
campaign for 72 hours! Of course, you must have seen my reaction to that. I
said there is nothing to suspend in a campaign that never took off in the first
instance! So much for the opposition's hysteria.
Today, I have called this press conference to set the
records straight and redirect the discourse. Contrary to what the opposition
and their ilk have been saying, this is not about the forthcoming elections,
neither does the suspension of the CJN signal the beginning of dictatorship.
President Buhari is an avowed democrat, and this he has proven time and time
again. This Administration stands firm on the rule of law!
This whole issue is about the country's highest judicial officer,
the Chief Justice of Nigeria, being accused of a breach of the Code of Conduct
for Public Officers, and the legal and moral conundrum surrounding that. It is
about the suspicious transactions running into millions of dollars to the
suspended CJN's personal attacks, all undeclared or improperly declared as
required by law. It is about the Hon. Justice Onnoghen himself admitting to the
charges that he indeed failed to follow the spirit and letter of the law in
declaring his assets, calling it a ‘mistake’. And it is about him refusing to
take responsibility, instead opting to put the entire judiciary on trial.
Please remember that Justice Onnoghen has been given the opportunity of fair
hearing, but he has been abusing his position and the judicial process by
filing frivolous applications and even dodging service of process.
The Role of the Media
It is regrettable to note that the media, which should have
led the discourse, has not done so. In fact, a section of the media has taken
sides. Several newspapers have written editorials on this issue. Some
newspapers have employed rather crude and obnoxious language to push forth
their opinions, while others have been more tempered. But curiously, none has
written from a perspective that shows that they understand the big picture.
What is the big picture? In the words of The Right
Honourable Sir Alfred Denning, or Lord Denning, then Lord Justice of the
British Court of Appeal, a judge should in his own character be beyond
reproach, or at any rate should have so disciplined himself that he is not
himself a breaker of the law. Still talking of the big picture, some have
suggested that the suspension of Justice Onnoghen is a threat to our democracy
or even the country's very existence. They are wrong. Again, Lord Denning,
himself quoting the words of Sydney Smith, said: ''Nations fall when judges are
unjust, because there is nothing which the multitude think worth defending.''
Had the section of the media that I referred to earlier understood the big
picture, they would have framed the debate differently, rather than work to
inflame passion and help those seeking to muddy the waters.
The Roles of the NJC and
The Code Of Conduct Tribunal
It is unfortunate that in the ensuing debate, the talk about
due process has overshadowed the talk about the substance. Procedure cannot or
should not trounce substance. That brings me to the role of the National
Judicial Council (NJC). Some have argued that the Justice Onnoghen issue should
have been referred to the NJC to handle. They would have been right if Justice
Onnoghen had been accused of professional misconduct, which is what is within
the purview of the NJC. The allegations against Justice Onnoghen go beyond
professional misconduct. It is the alleged breach of the Code of Conduct for
Public Officers. And only one body is statutorily empowered to deal with this:
The Code of Conduct Tribunal.
Interestingly, Justice Onnoghen himself has elucidated on
this. In various judgments, he upheld the provisions of the law concerning the
CCT. In one particular judgement he delivered on July 12, 2013, Justice
Onnoghen held that the CCT had EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION (emphasis mine) to deal
with all violations contravening any of the provisions of the Code of Conduct
Bureau. Let me put this in a layman's language: All breaches of the Code of
Conduct for Public Officers must be handled by the Code of Conduct Tribunal.
Pure and simple. In other words, Justice Onnoghen's judgement held that
theprovisions “expressly ousted the powers of ordinary regular courts in
respect of such violations.”
In a case between Ismaeel Ahmed and Nasiru Ahmed, Congress
for Progressive Change (CPC), Chairman of the Kano state chapter of the party,
and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has been
reported by the media, Onnoghen, while interpreting Paragraph 12 of the Fifth
Schedule of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) as regards CCT’s jurisdiction
held that, "…the said paragraph 12 provides as follows: ‘Any allegation
that a public officer has committed a breach of or has not complied with the
provisions of this Code shall be made to the Code of Conduct Bureau."
The judgement, which was delivered at the Supreme Court with
suit number 'SC.279/2012' before Justices Onnoghen and others, also held that
the provisions of the law are clearly unambiguous. Justice Onnoghen said that
the provisions are, "so construed literally meaning that any breaches of
any provisions of the said 5th schedule or matters of noncompliance with any
provisions of the Code shall be made to the Code of Conduct Bureau that has
established its Tribunal with the exclusive jurisdiction to deal with any
violations of any provisions under the Code.''
Is anyone still in doubt that the CCT is the right court to
try the alleged breach of the Code of Conduct for Public Officers levied
against Justice Onnoghen? Is it not clear that challenging the jurisdiction of
the CCT to try him is an abuse of court process by Justice Onnoghen?
As for those who argued that the CCT is wrong in ordering
Justice Onnoghen's suspension, are they aware that Justice Onnoghen himself
disagreed with them? In the judgement I referred to earlier, he wrote: “The
Tribunal to the exclusion of other courts is also empowered to impose any
punishments as specified under sub-paragraphs (2) (a), (b) & (c) of
paragraph 18 as provided in sub-paragraphs 3 and 4 of paragraph 18 while
appeals shall lie as of right from such decisions to the Court of Appeal."
In essence, the CCT is right to have directed Justice Onnoghen's suspension,
and the President did the right thing by acting on the orders of the CCT.
Needless to say that in many of the cases of professional misconduct against
judges that Justice Onnoghen has presided over at the NJC, judges have been
suspended while still undergoing trial!
Conclusion
Gentlemen, from the foregoing, it is clear that:
a) Contrary to the cacophony of voices that have been
muddying the waters, the CCT was acting within its powers in ordering the
suspension of Justice Onnoghen as Chief Justice of Nigeria, and President
Muhammadu Buhari was right in carrying out the order.
b) The suspension of Justice Onnoghen is a consequence of
his breach of the Code of Conduct for Public Officers and has nothing to do with
the forthcoming elections, neither does it signify the onset of dictatorship or
tyranny as some have insinuated. It amounts to irresponsible extrapolation to
say that the suspension of Justice Onnoghen is the onset of dictatorship.
c) A section of the media shirked their agenda-setting role
by failing to objectively lead the discourse on the issue of the allegation
facing Justice Onnoghen and his subsequent suspension. Certain editorials
crossed the acceptable limit of decent discourse, and did little or nothing to
enlighten the public on the issue at stake.
d) The opposition, in its reaction, is guilty of engaging in
hysteria and for overheating the polity. Conveniently, they have anchored their
failed campaign for the 2019 election on an issue that is totally unrelated to
the election. By their reaction, they have made their tattered umbrella
available for shielding alleged corrupt persons. Their leopard can never change
its spots: The PDP is corruption personified and it's only reason for seeking a
return to office is to complete their looting of the national treasury. The
attack dogs unleashed by the opposition have been engaging in incitement and
other actions that can threaten law and order. There is no cause for alarm, as
the law enforcement agencies are alive to their responsibilities.
e) The threat of mass action by some groups cannot undermine
the course of justice. More Nigerians are with us than are with them on this
issue, going by the feelers that we are getting from across the country. Those
who want to protest against the suspension of the CJN should feel free to
exercise their rights, within the limits of the law.
I thank you for your kind attention. I will now take
questions strictly related to the issues I have addressed.
Alhaji
Lai Mohammed
Honourable
Minister
Federal
Ministry of Information and Culture
Comments
Post a Comment