COURT OF APPEAL NULLIFIES ADELEKE'S TRIBUNAL VICTORY

UPDATED: Court of Appeal nullifies Adeleke’s tribunal victory

May 9, 2019

Senator Ademola Adeleke [Photo: TheCable]

Related News

Appeal Court reserves judgment on Osun governorship electionApril 24, 2019

Tribunal declares PDP's Adeleke winner of Osun governorship electionMarch 22, 2019

Osun Election: Don't appeal tribunal judgement, PDP urges OyetolaMarch 26, 2019

Download the full tribunal judgement that sacked Oyetola as Osun governorMarch 25, 2019

Osun Election: Your demonstration cannot sustain stolen mandate - AdelekeMarch 28, 2019

The Court of Appeal on Thursday in Abuja nullified the victory of Ademola Adeleke at the Osun State governorship election petition tribunal.
This was after the appeal filed by the Governor of Osun State, Gboyega Oyetola, challenging the declaration of Ademola Adeleke as the duly elected governor by the state election petition tribunal.
The appellate court also set aside the judgement of the tribunal of March 22, which declared Mr Adeleke winner of the election.
A five-member panel of the appeal court led by Jummai Sankey delivered the judgement with three members of the panel agreeing with the lead judgement.
The three other judges in agreement with the lead judgement read by Jummai Sankey are Abubakar Yahaya, Isaiah Akeju, and Bitrus Sanga.

A panel member, George Mbaba, gave a dissenting judgement.
Mr Adeleke contested the governorship election on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
The Independent National Electoral Commission declared Mr Oyetola winner after a supplementary poll but the tribunal said Mr Oyetola won the election at the first ballot.
Specifically, he faulted the judgment as unknown to the law because Justice Peter Obiorah who prepared and read the lead judgement did not participate fully during the hearing of the petition.
Mr Oyetola whose appeal was first heard by the court of appeal drew the attention of the court to the February 6 proceedings in which Mr Obiorah was absent at the tribunal and did not sign the proceeding of that day.

The appellant contended that what Mr Obiorah did amounted to judicial hear-say because the proceedings of February 6 when he was not in court was copiously copied in his lead judgement.
Insisting that judicial hearsay has no place in law, Mr Oyetola asked the appeal court to quash the judgement, allow the appeal and uphold the governorship election.


DISSENTING JUDGEMENT
In his dissenting judgment, Mr Mbaba disagreed that Justice Obiora did not not attend the proceedings of February 2.
He said the allegation that Justice Obiora did not sit is a well-articulated speculation.
According to Mr Mbaba, he resolved issues 1 to 4 in favour of Mr Adeleke and the Peoples Democratic Party.
Mr Mbaba, therefore, dismissed the appeal and awarded a cost of N200,000 against the appelant (Mr Oyetola).
(function(){(function(e){if(e){var t=e.cloneNode;e.cloneNode=function(n){var o=t.call(e,n);if(e.classList.contains("mceContentBody"))o.innerHTML=e.innerHTML,r(o);else try{i(o)}catch(e){}return o},i(e)}function n(e){if(e.parentNode)if(e.childNodes.length>1){for(var t=document.createDocumentFragment();e.childNodes.length>0;)t.appendChild(e.childNodes[0]);e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}else e.firstChild?e.parentNode.replaceChild(e.firstChild,e):e.parentNode.removeChild(e)}function r(e){if(e)try{for(var t=e.querySelectorAll(".gr_"),r=t.length,i=0;i<r;i++)n(t[i])}catch(e){}}function i(e){try{Object.defineProperty(e,"innerHTML",{get:function(){try{var t=e.ownerDocument.createRange();t.selectNodeContents(e);var n=t.cloneContents(),i=document.createElement("div");return i.appendChild(n),r(i),i.innerHTML}catch(e){return""}},set:function(t){try{var n=e.ownerDocument.createRange();n.selectNodeContents(e),n.deleteContents();var r=n.createContextualFragment(t);e.appendChild(r)}catch(e){}}})}catch(e){}}})(document.querySelector("[data-gramm_id='273515d0-4dbe-028f-e5f9-334af42f5c6e']")) })()